Search This Blog

Thursday, July 10, 2014

The littoral combat ship might not be living up to the Navy's promises

LCS-1 & LCS-2The Navy positioned the littoral combat ship, manufactured by both Lockheed Martin Corp. and Austal USA, as a low-cost alternative to other ships in the surface fleet. Six years after the first one was commissioned, it appears the LCS might not be living up to that promise.

Here’s why: Available data, much of it collected during the first-time deployment of Lockheed Martin's USS Freedom to Singapore, indicates that per year, per ship life-cycle costs are nearing or may exceed those of other surface ships, including multi-mission ships with greater size and larger crews.

According to a report from the Government Accountability Office, average life-cycle cost per year for the LCS is estimated to be $79 million — $64 million for the sea frames, and $15 million for mission modules. Compare that to 2011 estimates of $68 million all together.

Read more

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.

Fair Use Notice

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner.

The material is being made available in an effort to advance understanding arms trade activities, for non-profit research and educational purposes only.

I believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.

If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

This is a completely non-commercial site for private personal use. No fee is charged, and no money is made off of the operation of this site.