Search This Blog

Wednesday, July 04, 2012

Most Dutch MPs back ditching the JSF fighter jet, despite the cost

F-35 Lightning IIThe future of Dutch plans to buy dozens of JSF fighter jets is in doubt on Tuesday after it emerged a majority of MPs think the agreement should be scrapped.

Labour MP Angelien Eijsink said on Tuesday her party will enter a motion in parliament to cancel the JSF jet fighter project, according to media reports..

With Labour joining in calls for the project to be cancelled, there is now a parliamentary majority going into a debate on the subject on Thursday.

Read more

2 comments:

  1. Our F-16s will only last for 10 years tops. By that time half of our fleet will be grounded and be used for replacement parts. They have already been in service for twenty years and are out of updates and life-extensions. They need replacements badly. The Dutch parliament doesn't know the consequences of these cuts. We won't have an adequate air defense in terms of unit-quantaties and individual qualities. More issues with the jets will emerge and it will take it's toll eventually. Security and liberty come at it's costs and the parliament seems to forget about that. They have been accustomed to living in safety and relative peace, nearly forgetting about their guardians in the air, sea and on the land. The world is changing and we have to adapt, which in this context means; more advanced technology, durability and versitility.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The Saab Gripen looks like a good alternative for the PM's. Much cheaper, available and 100% compensation orders.

    You can check the life cycle costs at http://www.stratpost.com/gripen-operational-cost-lowest-of-all-western-fighters-janes

    ReplyDelete

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.

Fair Use Notice

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner.

The material is being made available in an effort to advance understanding arms trade activities, for non-profit research and educational purposes only.

I believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.

If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

This is a completely non-commercial site for private personal use. No fee is charged, and no money is made off of the operation of this site.