![''You could use a single-engine aircraft to do national and continental missions, but there would be greater risk involved. It is as simple as that,'' he said. ''When you lose an engine in a [twin-engine] CF-18, it’s a non-event'' F-35 Lightning II & F-18 Hornet](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiUCWuUuAp0uYX2YorLf5SWJyenwWGs6tLSHpniedAnbleLKaMBUn5VdkWDGDwQ92pbDFbjcx4z_yHwyZynxxi3WJ5QyNidBhbHdW4L9f8TSOzJj9djlcvpLGCQ6MsIt1Sp4ubx/s560/f-35c-F-18.jpg)
“Using a competition to simply delay making a decision is costly, unnecessary and not in the interests of Canadian taxpayers or Canadian industry. That is bad management, bad policy and bad for business,” the industry group made up of 35 Canadian firms said in an open letter.
But other voices are rising, arguing that the best way to find the aircraft that suits Canada’s needs is to launch a competition that would pit the single-engine F-35 against its rivals, including the twin-engine Boeing SuperHornet.
Read more
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.