![Sprey said the plane lacks maneuverability, will be easily detectable despite its stealth features, will be vulnerable to surface-to-air missiles on bombing missions, has a relatively small bombing payload compared to the F-16 and must fly too high and fast to be plausible as a close-support fighter-bomber F-35B Lightning II](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhdtA8-heRbreCDFUL0URhhuGljjXQEftyOUjWC0uEN2iEHAYoG1Rrwq7cSGjYw3UbC59Z-nLu82eSVVwrfNw1Oa66L7sL3dGaMZnN4fVuTGmHV-7ZE51psS4KkIjVfQKz9EfAY/s200/F-35B.jpg)
They have been strong supporters of basing the F-35 in Burlington, and the congressional delegation and Shumlin issued a joint statement Friday reaffirming their support for the plane and saying it would be good both for the Vermont Air National Guard and for Vermont’s economy.
Last week, Pierre Sprey, a co-designer of the F-16 and A-10 warplanes told some 400 people at an F-35 meeting in Burlington that the F-35 is a “shockingly” bad aircraft which will perform poorly on all of its designated missions: air-to-air combat, bombing and close support of ground troops.
Read more
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.